How to Observe the Exceptions of Debt in the Garnishment Writ

Author

Ph.d Student of history and theory of law at Iravan University

Abstract

As we know, one the most common writs which is applied by judicial authorities in order to protect the object of claim, is the garnishment writ. Nowadays, the writ of garnishment, in addition to the law courts, has also many applications in the councils of settlement of disputes and even in public prosecutor's office and criminal courts and due to the prorogation of legal procedure and taking a long time for termination and the complete enforcement of a verdict in the courts and judicial authorities of our country, an interest to this writ has been increased. Furthermore, since in most cases it may be possible for defendant of the claim or accused person to create problems for the plaintiff to access the object of judgment by hiding his/her properties, so this legal constitution can prevent such actions and facilitate the access of plaintiff to the object of judgment. On the other hand, in some cases applying the writ of garnishment may conflict with the observation of rules related to the exceptions of debt. As we know as a mandatory and binding principle accepted by the civil procedure law and civil execution of judgments law, it is impossible to attach whatever has been treated as exceptions of debt by the legislator. But the question of how to observe the exceptions of debt in the garnishment writ has not been talked about by the legislator. In the current article, it is intended that in addition to a brief review to the contents of garnishment writ, the question that whether in the process of issuance and enforcement of the writ of garnishment, it is necessary to observe the orders and regulations observing exceptions of debt or not, is being discussed.

Keywords