A different justice based on an inadequate law; contradictory judicial ruling and interpretations on commercial documents

Author

Assistant Professor in Jurisprudence and law department of Tehran central branch of islamic azad university

Abstract

Along with the check law enacted during 1355 and the latter amendments made in it, this law is implemented only regarding the checks whose drawee is a bank. The trade law enacted in 1311 is the most important law in our legislative system that has defined the regulations dominating the commercial documents. This act that is the defected translation of French commercial law of 1807 does not cover the clear and comprehensive rules on commercial documents, for this reason, different viewpoints and interpretations have been presented regarding the commercial documents and different subjects related to these documents. These opinion contradictions caused the non presence of similar judicial attitude on the claims related to the commercial documents and contradictory rulings are given in this context. The present paper is of the intention that most important opinion contradictions should be expressed by stressing on the divergence of judicial ruling related to the commercial documents in which the contradictory judicial ruling has more prominence. In addition, the deficiencies of trade law should be pictured with a different justice that has been issued and enacted by non similar and contradictory judicial ruling regarding the similar and same subjects. 

Keywords