Critique of the Judgment No. 9609970227200111 Branch 12 of the Civil Court of Tehran (Concept of Origin, Distinction between Defense and Action, Representation, Exceeding Authority by Managing Director)

Document Type : Technical-Scientific

Authors

1 Associate Professor at Law Faculty of Tehran University

2 Lecturer at the Faculty of Law and Political Science of Allameh Tabatabai University & Head of Branch 144 of the Civil Court of Tehran

Abstract

Judgment No. 9609970227200111 Branch 12 of the civil Court has been selected as the top judgment of justice in the province of Tehran in the group of civil courts. The judgment addresses a number of important issues in civil procedure and substantive law, especially representation and   company law. Some issues like change object of the demand, concept of same cause in cases where the obligation to perform the contract is first required and then the request for a verdict to declare the invalidity of that contract has been changed and then distinction between defense and action and its results and protest against the opinion of expert in civil procedure and representation, legal sanction of failure to determine authority of managing director or exceeding authority by managing director and legal sanction of non-compliance of select managers according to legal regulations in the field of substantive law is clear from this judgment. It seems that the mentioned judgment is one of the desirable judgments in our judicial system, but it is not without criticism. 

Keywords

Judgment
Volume 19, Issue 98 - Serial Number 98
September 2019
Pages 15-51

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 April 2019
  • Revise Date: 23 May 2019
  • Accept Date: 23 June 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics