1
حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه مفیر، قم، ایران
2
طلبه دروس خارج حوزه علمیه قم ، دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی دانشگاه تهران.
Abstract
Abstract Punishment, regardless of its quantity and quality, is always a requirement for the protection of social order, which has been determined by the legislature against crime and violation of norms, and is sometimes intensified. Intensification of punishment is one of the components of the principle of personal punishment and of the practical and challenging nature of public criminal law. One of the common causes of this issue is the number of credits that the legislator has dealt with in Article 3 of the Islamic Penal Code (approved in 1392). Due to the importance of discussing pluralism in criminal law, dire consequences and its non-belonging to a specific crime, the present study, while examining this important and explaining its various dimensions, expresses the challenges that have arisen in line with the provisions of this institution in practice, and to overcome them Has stated solutions. The main question of the article is what challenges can be faced by the institution of credit institution in practice and what solutions can be offered?
Emtehani, A., & naderiogbaghzi, J. (2023). Multiplicity of credit and multiplicity of results, ambiguities and challenges. Judgment, 23(113), 30-57.
MLA
Ahmadreza Emtehani; javad naderiogbaghzi. "Multiplicity of credit and multiplicity of results, ambiguities and challenges". Judgment, 23, 113, 2023, 30-57.
HARVARD
Emtehani, A., naderiogbaghzi, J. (2023). 'Multiplicity of credit and multiplicity of results, ambiguities and challenges', Judgment, 23(113), pp. 30-57.
VANCOUVER
Emtehani, A., naderiogbaghzi, J. Multiplicity of credit and multiplicity of results, ambiguities and challenges. Judgment, 2023; 23(113): 30-57.
)