1
.Assistant Professor of Private Law Department (Corresponding Author) Drmaryam.ahmadi@yahoo.com
2
.Basic lawyer of a court, member of Alborz Bar Association Badrzadeh.akbar@yahoo.com
Abstract
The undisputed principle is that regarding the holding of hearings and their administration, whenever the legal standards such as legal verification of notice and notification, absence of death and death of the parties and compliance with the provisions of the petition are not met and the meeting is convened for no purpose, it will have a guarantee of execution. In such a way that it will not only result in the disciplinary violation of the judge, but it will also cause the decision to be invalid in some cases, and in higher authorities, it will cause the cancellation of the petition; Therefore, the realization of the right and the implementation of justice in the courts require that the platform and context be provided for the litigants so that the parties can easily present their claims and arguments. There are still legal loopholes regarding the investigation of such issues, even though they are major. For example, the situation when the order of the meeting is disturbed by one of the litigants and their lawyer is not clear. Therefore, this study is trying to analyze each of the examples that cause the necessity of order in the hearing.
بهرامی، بهرام، آیین دادرسی حقوقی، آشنایی عملی با نحوه رسیدگی در محاکم عمومی، چاپ دوم، روزنامه رسمی کشور، تهران، 1374.
حیاتی، علی عباس، آیین دادرسی مدنی در نظم حقوقی کنونی، چاپ سوم، سال سوم، انتشارات بنیاد حقوقی میزان، 1392.
ریاست جمهوری (معاونت حقوقی و امور مجلس)، مجموعه قوانین و مقررات آیین دادرسی مدنی، چاپ هشتم، انتشارات معاونت پژوهش، تدوین و تنقیح قوانین و مقررات، تهران، 1387.
زراعت، عباس، آیین دادرسی دادگاههای عمومی و انقلاب در امور مدنی، انتشارات خط سوم، جلد اول، 1379.
