Relative jurisdiction of judicial authorities refers to the competence and discretion assigned among courts with identical intrinsic jurisdiction, taking into account the subject matter of the disputes as well as the type and degree of offenses. This type of jurisdiction has recognized applications under the current laws of the country. For instance, Criminal Courts One and Two, despite having the same intrinsic jurisdiction over criminal offenses, possess relative jurisdiction with respect to each other. This is confirmed by Note 2 of Article 314 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (2013) and the Binding Precedent No. 752 dated 24/8/2016 of the General Board of the Supreme Court. The Court of Conciliation is also a judicial authority with relative jurisdiction. Pursuant to Article 12 of the Law on Dispute Resolution Councils (22/9/2023), it has competence over a range of civil, family, and criminal matters. Although a literal reading of the enumerated competencies in the aforementioned article may suggest that this court is an exceptional (specialized) court with intrinsic jurisdiction, in reality, the Court of Conciliation possesses relative jurisdiction in relation to civil, criminal (Courts One and Two), and family courts for the matters specified in the article. Consequently, in cases involving ancillary or related claims or multiple charges against a defendant, the court possessing broader legal authority will adjudicate all related disputes and multiple offenses, exercising greater powers than the Court of Conciliation in the adjudication of these claims and offenses.