Judgment

Judgment

The Termination of the Prosecution Decision in Terms of the Validity of the Closed Case; Critique of the Final Decision No. 9709970245700529 Branch 5 of the District 2 Court of Tehran

Document Type : Scientific

Author
Assistant Professor at Law and Political Science Faculty of Allameh Tabatabai University
Abstract
The validity of a final criminal case is one of the permanent obstacles to prosecuting public litigation. The Code of Criminal Procedure does not specify the conditions for the validity of a final judgement, and in this respect there are differences in judicial procedure. This article reviews one of the suspended prosecution decisions regarding the validity of the seal. The author agrees with the result of the opinion, but disagrees with the principles and arguments used in this agreement. In this decision, five conditions are stated for the validity of the sealed matter, some of which do not seem to be necessary, including unity in the psychological element. Therefore, the three conditions of unity of the subject, the parties and the cause are necessary for the realization of the validity of the final matter. On the other hand, some crimes are indivisible to the plaintiff and the absence of the plaintiff does not violate the validity of the final decision.
Keywords

  1. فهرست منابع

    الف. فارسی

    1. آشوری، محمد، آیین دادرسی کیفری، جلد اول، سمت، چاپ چهارم، ۱۳۷۸.
    2. خدابخشی، عبدالله، «نگرشی تازه به اعتبار امر مختوم در حقوق کیفری»، فصلنامه حقوق، مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دوره 38، شماره 3، پاییز 1387.
    3. خزانی، منوچهر، «اعتبار امر مختوم در دعوی کیفری»، تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره ۱۱ و ۱۲، پاییز و زمستان ۱۳۷۱.
    4. محسنی، سعید، «اعتبار امر قضاوتشده و مبانی آن»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، شماره ۳۱، تابستان ۱۳۷۹.

    ب. خارجی

    1. Pradel, Jean, procédure pénale, 13e edition, Éditions cujas, 2007.

  • Receive Date 29 October 2019
  • Revise Date 29 November 2019
  • Accept Date 08 February 2020