P.H.D of International Law of Allameh Tabataba'i University
Abstract
Before Gabcikovo-Nagymaros's case in the International Court of Justice, the effects and requirements of the necessity defense which is long-standing in international law were unclear. In this case, the Court declares that the necessity is accepted only in exceptional condition and as the only means of safeguarding an essential interest of the state against a grave and imminent peril. The state must not have contributed to the occurrence of the state of necessity and the act must not have seriously impaired an essential interest of the state towards which the obligation existed. In addition to the International Court of Justice, other international courts, including the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the ICSID, have also dealt with necessity and its effects and requirements. The findings of these courts are the basis of the formulation of necessity in Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States (2001) and Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations (2011).
بذّار، وحید، «تحلیل محتواى رأى دیوان بینالمللى دادگسترى در قضیه گابچیکوو ناگیماروس»، فصلنامه تعالی حقوق، شماره 183، 1396.
زمانی، سیدقاسم و بذّار، وحید، «نقش زیاندیده در بروز خسارت در حقوق مسئولیت بینالمللی»، مجله مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 10، شماره 1، 1398.
زمانی، سیدقاسم، حقوق سازمانهای بینالمللی، انتشارات شهر دانش، چاپ اول، تهران، 1392.
شافع، میرشهبیز و بذّار، وحید، «جانشینی دولتها در مسئولیت بینالمللی»، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 81، 1397.
ضیایی، سیدیاسر، «جایگاه تعهدات زیست محیطی در حقوق بینالملل سرمایهگذاری»، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق عمومی، سال 15، شماره 42، 1393.
مافی، همایون و بذّار، وحید، «نظریه سلسله مراتب هنجاری در پرتو استانداردهای حقوق بشری با تأکید بر رویه قضایی بینالمللی»، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی، دوره 46، شماره 4، 1395.
ب. انگلیسی
Agius, Maria. (2006). The Invocation of Necessity in International Law, LLM Thesis in International Law, pp. 1-95.
Allott, Philip. (1988). State responsibility and the unmaking of international law, Harvard International Law Journal, pp. 3-26.
Aust, Helmut Philipp. (2014). Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness, Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law: An Appraisal of the State of the Art-edited by Andre Nollkaemper and Elias Plakokefalos, Cambridge University Press, 169-207.
Boed, Roman. (2000). State of Necessity as a Justification for Internationally Wrongful Conduct, Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, pp. 1-44.
Crawford, James and Olleson, Simon. (2003), The Character and Forms of International Responsibility, International Law-edited by Malcolm D. Evans, Oxford University Press, pp. 446-470.
Desierto, Diane A. (2012), Necessity and National Emergency Clauses: Sovereignty in Modern Treaty Interpretation, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Dixon, Martin and McCorquodale, Robert and Williams, Sarah. (2011), Cases and Materials on International Law, Oxford University Press.
Hayashi, Nobuo. (2010). Requirements of Military Necessity in International Humanitarian Law and International Criminal Law, Boston University of International Law Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 39-140.
Heathcote, Sarah. (2010), Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in the ILC Articles on State Responsibility: Necessity, The Law of International Responsibility-edited by James Crawford, Alain Pellet, and Simon Olleson, Oxford University Press, pp. 491-501.
Hoelck Thjoernelund, Marie Christine. (2009). State of Necessity as an Exemption from State Responsibility for Investments, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Vol. 13, pp. 423-480.
Kutoroff, Arthur. (2016). Excuse in International Law, Capital University Law Review, Vol. 44, pp. 1-63.
Nakatani, Kazuhiro. (2005), Diplomacy and State Responsibility, International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter-edited by Maurizio Ragazzi, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 37-48.
O’Connell, Mary Ellen. (2005), Controlling Countermeasures, International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter-edited by Maurizio Ragazzi, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 49-62.
Paddeu, Federica. (2017). Clarifying the Concept of Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness (Justifications) in International Law, Legal Stadies Research (University of Cambridge), Paper No. 18/2017, pp. 1-22.
Ripinsky, Sergey. (2007). State of Necessity: Effect on Compensation, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1-17.
Ryngaert, Cedric. (2010), State Responsibility, Necessity and Human Rights, The Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 41, 79-98.
Sloane, Robert D. (2012). On the Use and Abuse of Necessity in the Law of State Responsibility, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 106, pp. 447-508.
Tsagourias, Nicholas. (2010), Necessity and the Use of Force: A Special Regime, The Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 41, 11-44.
Tsagourias, Nicholas. (2011). The Responsibility of International Organisations for Military Missions, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1-15.
Vinuales, Jorge E. (2017), Seven ways of escaping a rule: Of exceptions and their avatars in international law, Exceptions in International Law-edited by L. Bartels and F. Paddeu, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-2.
Bazzar,V. (2020). Necessity Defense and its Effects and Requirements in International Law with Emphasis on Practice of International Courts. Judgment, 19(100), 131-155.
MLA
Bazzar,V. . "Necessity Defense and its Effects and Requirements in International Law with Emphasis on Practice of International Courts", Judgment, 19, 100, 2020, 131-155.
HARVARD
Bazzar V. (2020). 'Necessity Defense and its Effects and Requirements in International Law with Emphasis on Practice of International Courts', Judgment, 19(100), pp. 131-155.
CHICAGO
V. Bazzar, "Necessity Defense and its Effects and Requirements in International Law with Emphasis on Practice of International Courts," Judgment, 19 100 (2020): 131-155,
VANCOUVER
Bazzar V. Necessity Defense and its Effects and Requirements in International Law with Emphasis on Practice of International Courts. Judgment, 2020; 19(100): 131-155.
