1
Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.e.kashkoulian@khuisf.ac.ir
2
Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.m.heydari@khuisf.ac.ir
3
Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.mahmood.ashrafy2000@gmail.com
Abstract
In general, the right of the prosecutor to protest against the decisions of the courts is foreseen as one of their powers in the legislative and judicial system of the country, so that in addition to vindicating the rights related to the criminal case, an effective step is taken in the direction of achieving justice. The purpose of this research is to know and explain the basic principles of the prosecutor's right to protest against the decisions issued by the courts, to understand the importance of the role of the prosecutor in exercising this right and its effect on the realization of a fair trial. This research has been done with a descriptive analytical method through library studies related to the subject. The results of the research indicate that the prosecutor's objection to the judicial decisions has solid jurisprudence and legal foundations, which include the jurisprudence rule and the jurisprudence rule as well as the obligation to remove and repel oppression. And its legal foundations are also the theory of maintaining public order, the idea of preserving individual rights and freedoms, protection of public rights, supervision of law enforcement and humanitarian and human rights considerations.
Ahmadian J, Tabrizian B. Restorative criminal policy in the institution of suspension of punishment. Journal of Criminology 2017; 9(3): 14-30. [Persian]
Bahrami N. Rehabilitation of the accused in the suspension of punishment, by the editorial board of the Yasaa Lawyers Group, 2018. [Persian]
Bahremand H. Uncle imprisonment policy in the legislative system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal: Strategy 2017; 82(26):316-332. [Persian]
4) Bruce C. Fundamentals of Sociology. Journal of Legal Studies 2015; 7(5): 83-99. [Persian]
5) Copas J, Marshall P The offender group reconviction scale: a statistical reconviction score for use by probation officers. Journal of Legal Justice 2014; 26(4): 32-50
Dadgarnia AR. Suspension of punishment, a deterrent to the commission of a crime. Journal of Judgment 2013;17(21): 29-43. [Persian]
7) Falsafi H. International Law of Treaties. Tehran: Publishing Culture of Nashr-e-Pr, First Edition, 2018. [Persian]
Gholami N, Moazenzadegan H. The place of ethical requirements in the preliminary investigation process in the Iranian Code of Criminal Procedure. Bioethics Journal 2016; 7(25): 31-44. [Persian]
9) Hosseinian, H. Ethics and a fair trial in the light of the predictability of suspended sentences). Journal of Parliament and Strategy 2016; 23(1): 49-73. [Persian]
Jamadi A. The role of the provincial appellate court in mitigating punishments with emphasis on reducing imprisonment. Journal of Jurisprudence 2019;16(7): 135-156[Persian]
11) Javadi R. A Brief History of Legal Theory in the West. Tehran: Mizan Publishing, Second Printing, 2009. [Persian]
12) Javid Nia J. International Crimes. Tehran: Khorsandi Publishing, First Printing; 2010. [Persian]
13) Kashkoulian,E, Sheikholeslami, A, Naghavi, M. Environmental Crimes and Preventive Strategies. Journal of Bioethics, 2019; 9(32): 101-110. [Persian]
Kashkoulian, E., & Naghavi, M. (2022). A Comparative Study of Crime Cost Assessment in Criminal Law and Shiite Jurisprudence. Fares Law Research, 4(9), 527-540.
Kashkoulian, E., Ashrafi Mahabadi, M., & Amirian Farsani, A. (2023). Economics of Crime in the Analysis of Pluralism of Punishment and its Individualization. Fares Law Research, 6(15), 259-268. [Persian]
16) Mirkamali A, Hajiyavand A. Environmental Prevention Analysis in the Light of UN Directives and the Ethical Principle of Prevention of Loss. Journal of Biomedicine 2014; 26(4): 61-75. [Persian]
17) Mirtorabi M.S, Shafiei F, Rezvanfar A. Pains of Probation: Effective Practice and Human Rights. Journal of Offender Therapy and ComparativeCriminology 2015; 3(6): 27-41
18) Misaghi A. Suspension of criminal punishment in the United States and Europe. Fourth Edition, Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publishing House, 2019. [Persian]
19) Mohammad Nasl G.R. A Practical Study of Suspension of Punishment in Criminal Law and Procedure of Iranian Courts. Journal of Private Law Studies 2017; 4(2): 75-87. [Persian]
20) Mohseni, M. Criminal ethics in America. Tehran: Taheri Publishing, First Printing, 2010. [Persian]
21) Moustaghi H. International Law between the Rule of Will and Law. Tehran: First Printing, Tabriz, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, 2013. [Persian]
22) Najafiabrandabadi A.H. Suspension of punishment and restorative justice. Journal ofCriminal law and Criminology,2018; 26(4): 32-50. [Persian]
Pourbafarani H. Hemati M. A Review of Iran's Criminal Code Against International Crimes. Journal of Parliament and Strategy 2016; 23(12): 349-373. [Persian]
24) Pour-Safari H. International Criminal Law. Journal of Political law 2017; 21(3): 20-33. [Persian]
25) Razavi F, Public International Criminal Law, Second Edition, and Tehran: Publishing University of Tehran, 2016. [Persian]
26) Roche Gee. Postponement of punishment and fair trial.by Iraj Goldouzian, Nashr-e N, Fourth Edition, 2011. [Persian]
27) Saadati R, Hashemi H, Varvaee A. The Impact of Ethics on Criminalization and Decriminalization in the Islamic Criminal Law System of Iran. Journal of Criminal Law Research 2013; 3(8): 33-62. [Persian]
Safari AR. Suspension of execution of punishment (goals and effects). Journal of Correction and Education 2012; 19(4):41-59. [Persian]
Ward T, Salmon K. The ethics of punishment: Correctional practice implications. Journal ofAggression and Violent Behavior 2009;14(8): 239-247. [Persian]
Kashkoulian,E. , Heydari,M. and Ashrafi,M. (2023). Jurisprudence and Legal Bases of the Prosecutor's Objection to Judicial Opinions. Judgment, 21(108), 129-149.
MLA
Kashkoulian,E. , , Heydari,M. , and Ashrafi,M. . "Jurisprudence and Legal Bases of the Prosecutor's Objection to Judicial Opinions", Judgment, 21, 108, 2023, 129-149.
HARVARD
Kashkoulian E., Heydari M., Ashrafi M. (2023). 'Jurisprudence and Legal Bases of the Prosecutor's Objection to Judicial Opinions', Judgment, 21(108), pp. 129-149.
CHICAGO
E. Kashkoulian, M. Heydari and M. Ashrafi, "Jurisprudence and Legal Bases of the Prosecutor's Objection to Judicial Opinions," Judgment, 21 108 (2023): 129-149,
VANCOUVER
Kashkoulian E., Heydari M., Ashrafi M. Jurisprudence and Legal Bases of the Prosecutor's Objection to Judicial Opinions. Judgment, 2023; 21(108): 129-149.