Judgment

Judgment

Analyzing the Basis of Criminalizing Incitement to Suicide in Children and Adolescents in the Context of Cyberspace

Document Type : Scientific

Authors
1 Graduated with a specialized doctorate in criminal law and criminology from Tehran University. Tehran,Iran.(Corresponding Author). javan-j@um.ac.ir
2 Judge Court, PhD student in Criminal Justice and Criminology at Meybod University. Meybod, Iran. msheibani89@gmail.com
Abstract
The expansion of cyberspace and the removal of geographical restrictions have made it possible to establish communication in the shortest possible time and have attracted a wide range of users. Despite these advantages, challenges have also emerged in this area that have led governments to increase surveillance, criminalize, and restrict behaviors that threaten public interests. One of the serious challenges of cyberspace is the incitement of vulnerable individuals, especially children and adolescents, to commit suicide; a phenomenon that, in addition to endangering the individual's life, causes irreparable mental and physical harm to those around them and deprives society of future human capital. Success in confronting this phenomenon through criminalization requires choosing the principles that are most consistent with the views of the government and social norms. In this regard, the present study examines the principles of criminology in three social, political, and legal dimensions using a descriptive-analytical method. These principles include the principle of harm, social acceptability, and public resentment in the social dimension, the principles of legal patriarchy and expediency in the political dimension, and the protection of legal morality, privacy, the minimal nature of criminal titles, and the coordination of cyberspace laws with international approaches in the legal dimension.




 
Keywords

Subjects


1.         احمدی موحد، اصغر. (1380). «حذف دادسرا، علل و نتایج»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، دوره 65، شماره 36، صص 134-125.
2.         افسرده، عطاءالله. جلال‌پور، شیوا و عامری گلستانی، حامد. (1397). «واکاوی جایگاه حقوق طبیعی فرد در قانون اساسی مشروطه»، پژوهشنامه علوم سیاسی، دوره 13، شماره 3، صص 36-7.
3.         امین، حسن. (1391). تاریخ حقوق ایران، تهران: دایره المعارف ایران‌شناسی.
4.         انصاری، ولی‌الله. (1380). حقوق تحقیقات جنایی (مطالعه تطبیقی)، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
5.         آبراهامیان، یرواند. (1402). ایران بین دو انقلاب، ترجمه احمد گل‌محمدی. تهران: نشر نی.
6.         آدمیت، فریدون. (1349). اندیشه‌های میرزا فتحعلی آخوندزاده، تهران: انتشارات خوارزمی.
7.         آدمیت، فریدون. (1363). اندیشه‌های طالبوف تبریزی، تهران: انتشارات دماوند.
8.         آشوری، محمد. (1376). عدالت کیفری (مجموعه مقالات)، تهران: گنج دانش.
9.         آشوری، محمد. (1400). آیین دادرسی کیفری. جلد 2، ویراست پنجم، تهران: سمت.
 
10.  Afary, J. (1994). Social democracy and the Iranian Constitutional Revolution of 1906-11, In A century of revolution: social movements in Iran, John Foran (ed). Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.PP 21-43.
11.  Bartlett, Robert (1986). Trial by Fire and Water, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.  Colin, Morris (1975).  Judicium Dei: The Social and Political Significance of the Ordeal in the Eleventh Century”, Studies in Church History 12,  PP 95-111.
13.  Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia C. and Stone, Harold S. (1989). Montesquieu: The spirit of the laws, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Receive Date 09 March 2025
  • Revise Date 08 April 2025
  • Accept Date 14 April 2025