Undoubtedly, the rules governing civil enforcement in legal systems aim to fully realize rights, ensuring that the entitled party receives their due. In terms of enforcement, efforts should be made to facilitate effective execution of judgments, allowing the claimant to obtain their rights in the shortest possible time. Effective enforcement of a court ruling must not be confused with unlawful execution; while swift enforcement is important, the dignity of the defendant must also be preserved. Accordingly, enforcement laws include provisions regarding insolvency and exemptions from debt. Following amendments to Article 10 of the amended law on the formation of general and revolutionary courts, Article 34 of the amended regulation, and the approval of guidelines for organizing and expediting civil enforcement, Section "H" of Article 18 of the guidelines introduces the concept of prohibition from services in the context of enforcement. This paper uses a descriptive-analytical method and library resources to explore the meaning of prohibiting a defendant from services as outlined in the guidelines, and whether the jurisprudential and legal system of Iran accepts this measure as an effective means of enforcing court rulings. The findings indicate that, firstly, this measure inherently functions as a penalty requiring legislative action by the parliament. Secondly, its implementation must respect human dignity. Thirdly, it should not result in the civil death of the defendant.